Have you ever heard the expression, “It’s the singer, not the song”? I associate the line with The Who song “Join Together” (1972). (The full line is actually, “It’s the singer not the song that makes the music move along.”) There’s actually an early Rolling Stones song entitled “The Singer Not the Song”, but I have already digressed. In other words, is that true? Can a fantastic singer turn a less than fantastic song into something good or does enjoying the song thereby make the song “good” in and of itself?
Philosophically, it’s a chicken or egg situation. Here is an example to ponder. I was going through my running list of blog ideas and found a note for Wilson Pickett “Sugar, Sugar”. I have no idea where/when I came cross this version. However, it seems like the singer and the song are at opposite ends of the musical spectrum, don’t they?
Give Mr. Pickett some credit. He definitely sounds like himself regardless of the song’s format, which is most definitely bubble gum pop. Apparently, his version charted in both the R & B and pop charts in 1970. The Archies’ orginal version was released in 1969 and was written by Jeff Barry and Andy Kim. Apparently Don Kirshner (The Rock Concert guy) arranged the studio musicians for the recording.
I don’t know if that settles the whole singer vs. song, chicken vs. egg thing, but it’s worth a listen. I thought about delving into “Do the Funky Chicken” by Rufus Thomas, but will save it for later.
Till next time, keep your Mojo on the Horizon!










